Comments on: Rogers Q1 Earnings: A Closer Look http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/05/02/rogers-q1-earnings-a-closer-look/ Covering The Great Wireless North Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Wirelessnorth.ca » Blog Archive » An inauspicious start to Intel’s conquest of the wireless industry http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/05/02/rogers-q1-earnings-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-579 Wirelessnorth.ca » Blog Archive » An inauspicious start to Intel’s conquest of the wireless industry Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:33:46 +0000 http://wirelessnorth.ca/?p=161#comment-579 [...] earlier reported on WirelessNorth.ca, Canadian carriers Bell and Rogers announced at their recent earnings call that they do not have plans to invest further Wimax. They [...] [...] earlier reported on WirelessNorth.ca, Canadian carriers Bell and Rogers announced at their recent earnings call that they do not have plans to invest further Wimax. They [...]

]]> By: Christian Laroche http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/05/02/rogers-q1-earnings-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-1892 Christian Laroche Fri, 02 May 2008 18:45:19 +0000 http://wirelessnorth.ca/?p=161#comment-1892 Good insights.<br><br>Not to make too much of a fine point on this, but LTE is 4G, not 3.xG. 3GPP has stated that the down links should be 100Mbps, not a "paltry" 7.xMbps ;-)<br><br><a href="http://www.3gpp.org/Highlights/LTE/LTE.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.3gpp.org/Highlights/LTE/LTE.htm</a><br><br>cheers Good insights.

Not to make too much of a fine point on this, but LTE is 4G, not 3.xG. 3GPP has stated that the down links should be 100Mbps, not a “paltry” 7.xMbps ;-)

http://www.3gpp.org/Highlights/LTE/LTE.htm

cheers

]]> By: Christian Laroche http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/05/02/rogers-q1-earnings-a-closer-look/comment-page-1/#comment-805 Christian Laroche Fri, 02 May 2008 11:45:19 +0000 http://wirelessnorth.ca/?p=161#comment-805 Good insights.<br><br>Not to make too much of a fine point on this, but LTE is 4G, not 3.xG. 3GPP has stated that the down links should be 100Mbps, not a "paltry" 7.xMbps ;-)<br><br><a href="http://www.3gpp.org/Highlights/LTE/LTE.htm">http://www.3gpp.org/Highlights/LTE/LTE.htm</a><br><br>cheers Good insights.

Not to make too much of a fine point on this, but LTE is 4G, not 3.xG. 3GPP has stated that the down links should be 100Mbps, not a “paltry” 7.xMbps ;-)

http://www.3gpp.org/Highlights/LTE/LTE.htm

cheers

]]>