Wirelessnorth.ca

Covering The Great Wireless North
  • Home
  • About
  • Canada’s Digital Economy
  • Canada’s 2008 Spectrum Auction
  • Submit a story

July 3rd, 2008Bell jacking TXT messaging fees

Posted by Jevon in Uncategorized

Bell has decided that they would like to dip in to your pockets a little further, and now that you are hooked on TXT messaging, why not start there?

From now on all TXTs received on your Bell phone will count against you. If you have no TXTing plan, you will pay 15cents/message, if you do have a plan, incoming messages will now count against your total. So if you have a plan that includes 100 TXT messages, and I send you 3, you are down to 97 messages.

If you send a TXT message from outside of the country, you are now on the hook for 60cents. Most US providers charge 20cents for the same service.

  • Robert

    Wow. This sucks! SMS is taking away from voice minutes. Damn bandits. Let me guess their excuse is, high gas prices?

  • Sportyboard

    In some more positive news, though, Bell will be offering an unlimited data plan for – get this – $10 a month with the Samsung Instinct. http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/07/03/b…

  • Bebo

    Same with Telus actually, at the end of August I believe…
    I hope this doesn't turn into a trend!

  • http://startupnorth.ca Jevon

    In Canada, 2 makes more than a trend. ;-)

  • http://www.cellphones.ca branden

    haha. high gas prices. lovely. no doubt.

  • http://startupnorth.ca Jevon

    Well, they do have to truck those bits from one place to another. Why do you think your TXT message can be so delayed sometimes? (90 minutes for me today a few times)

  • http://montrealtechwatch.com heri

    I was in France before Montreal, and over there, people who receive calls on their mobile phones don't pay anything.

    Everybody takes it for granted since you can't control who calls you. It might be one dear friends, but also a telemarketer or someone who misdialled.

    this was the most natural of things until I landed in Canada and actually learned that you have to pay if someone calls you.

    I strongly believe this practice is one of the main reasons why mobile phone penetration is much higher in North America, especially Canada, compared to Europe. Over there, everyone has a mobile phone, with many of my friends having a couple or three.

  • WirelessGuy

    Monkey see, monkey do.

    Most US carriers are charging for incoming text now. Why would our greedy Canadian counterparts choose to leave that revenue on the table when the Americans have set the precedent? This is a move to improve ARPU by incenting you to sign up to a $5+ monthly text package. The actual costs to deliver text messaging are decreasing every due to depreciation of the infrastructure used to deliver it. Factor in volume discounting in intra-carrier SMS deals too.

    Rogers is next. Count on it.

    What's on the horizon? $0.20 per message.

  • WirelessGuy

    Having 2 or 3 SIM cards is the other side of the coin – who *really* wants to juggle multiple SIM cards just so they can get a better rate?

    You're correct, one of the major reasons why mobile phone penetration is so low here is because of unlimited landline free local calling zones. People here expect to make local calls for free at all times – and do – affordably , both incoming and outgoing. Plus, the landline infrastructure is great here and readily available. This has not always been the case in a lot of European countries.

    Network operator policy and technology such as network/carrier incompatibilities, CDMA, and the lack of openly unlocked GSM handsets, to name a few, also have contributed.

  • WirelessGuy

    It's not a trend, it's a cartel. :-)

  • WirelessGuy

    Intercarrier SMS by chance? Blame the delay on shoddy infrastructure provided by a third party and technology differences which made the intercarrier gateway necessary in the first place.

  • http://startupnorth.ca Jevon

    No Rogers PAYGO to normail Rogers.

  • oppy69

    hey, if you don't want to pay to receive text messages, just ask to opt out of the feature (SMST). surely they can't force you to pay for a service you don't want.

  • oppy69

    hey, if you don't want to pay to receive text messages, just ask to opt out of the feature (SMST). surely they can't force you to pay for a service you don't want.

  • http://www.remmrit.com/messaging Bookmarks about Messaging

    [...] – bookmarked by 2 members originally found by MOES153 on 2008-08-20 Bell jacking TXT messaging fees http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/07/03/bell-jacking-txt-messaging-fees/ – bookmarked by 5 members [...]

  • rss iconSubscribe to WirelessNorth.ca
    twitter iconFollow us on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
  • Blogroll

    • CommunityNorth.ca
    • StartupNorth.ca


© 2007 Wirelessnorth.ca |iKon Wordpress Theme | Powered by Wordpress
RSS