Comments on: But why break up a 4.25 Billion dollar party? http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/07/30/but-why-break-up-a-425-billion-dollar-party/ Covering The Great Wireless North Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jim http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/07/30/but-why-break-up-a-425-billion-dollar-party/comment-page-1/#comment-1819 Jim Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:10:23 +0000 http://wirelessnorth.ca/?p=261#comment-1819 I'm definitely of the opinion that wireless spectrum should have followed patent law a bit more, with multi-year leases rather than the disaster that is copyright law (royalties for pretty much forever) I'm definitely of the opinion that wireless spectrum should have followed patent law a bit more, with multi-year leases rather than the disaster that is copyright law (royalties for pretty much forever)

]]> By: Jim http://wirelessnorth.ca/2008/07/30/but-why-break-up-a-425-billion-dollar-party/comment-page-1/#comment-990 Jim Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:10:23 +0000 http://wirelessnorth.ca/?p=261#comment-990 I'm definitely of the opinion that wireless spectrum should have followed patent law a bit more, with multi-year leases rather than the disaster that is copyright law (royalties for pretty much forever) I'm definitely of the opinion that wireless spectrum should have followed patent law a bit more, with multi-year leases rather than the disaster that is copyright law (royalties for pretty much forever)

]]>