Wirelessnorth.ca

Covering The Great Wireless North
  • Home
  • About
  • Canada’s Digital Economy
  • Canada’s 2008 Spectrum Auction
  • Submit a story

July 23rd, 2010Who thought it would be a good idea for cablecos to own all the broadband pipes?

Rogers pushes a few buttons to mitigate Netflix threat

Posted by Editor in Rogers, tv

In theory, cable TV is a dead media. We have sufficient technology, today, that we can stream any episode of anything ever recorded, anytime, in real time, and in HD to any broadband household. A few decades from now, this whole idea of only being able to watch pre-selected recorded content at certain hours of the day is going to seem awfully strange and quaint. Not to mention the bizarre ritual of millions of subscribers manually making millions of copies of that content on their PVRs when perfectly good original copy already exist on the cloud.

Now in reality, traditional cable/satelite tv isn’t going away anytime soon. The service is reliable, it offers an important easy/lazy level of usability that pc-based alternatives haven’t nearly matched yet. But clearly the writing is on the wall. And services like netflix streaming, and boxee, and youtube, and many others are closing in.

BUT! great news for endangered cable executives everywhere: guess who controls all of the last-mile internet pipes in North America? It’s like having foxes as the sole provider of the chicken pipelines.

Even Michael Hennessy Telus’ top lobbyist has been sounding the alarm that the real net neutrality issue isn’t net neutrality, it’s vertical integration. This concerns, because Telus doesn’t have the same media assets as Bell and Rogers.

When companies with substantial media assets and huge legacy distribution businesses (a.k.a. cable tv) also own the only pipes into your home, it would be crazy not to expect them to use every available lever to favour their own content stack over any others.

And so on the eve of netflix coming to Canada, Rogers cuts their broadband caps (again).

Rogers “extreme” cable option is advertised as 15 Mbps with an 80GB cap at $60/month before taxes and other fees.

For the record, at full theoretical advertised speed, 80GB would earn you 12.9* hours of usage a month, or just under 30 minutes of usage a day.

80GB = 696,320 megabits / 15 megabits per second / 3600 seconds in an hour = 12.9 hrs

ps. why would this apply to wireless? Well for one it’s all the same players, for another tv and video streaming can be wireless too, and perhaps most importantly all of this logic could apply to separating voice service from wireless pipes as well.

  • http://twitter.com/andrewfergusson Andrew Fergusson

    The main reason why Bell and Telus possess the last mile is that they were originally crown corporations who were paid to hook up each and every new development by taxes. During privatisation, everything including the last mile was sold to the highest majority-Canadian-owned bidder from backbone infrastructure to the last mile.

    Essentially, what was built as a public utility became a private monopoly. This is when the customer gets hurt. Telus can offer better deals than indie ISP Techsavvy because whatever price Techsavvy can offer will be increased by the mandatory Telus line rental fee.

    The problem is that despite the good job capitalism does a great job ensuring that there is redundancy (Rogers, Telus, Shaw, and Bell all maintain their own backbone infrastructure so we're covered in the case of one going down), there's only one telephony hookup to each house. Now we have private monopolies forcing everyone who wants service to do business with them, even if the customer chooses to utilise a third-party ISP.

    I don't have objections to monopolies in this case, though. A natural monopoly is beneficial when having competing businesses or infrastructure does not make any sense. Canada has many crown corporations which possess natural monopolies such as city water, sewage, power transmission, letter mail, and we used to do it with the last mile of telephony.

    When governments realise that any last mile natural monopoly is beneficial as a public utility, will there be true competition in content delivery.

    (On a side note, it also makes sense with telecommunications towers. Why have each mobile phone provider build an unsightly tower when there's often more than enough room for each business' equipment on one?)

  • Alan Sawyer

    Just for the record… while Telus does have crown-corporation roots, Bell Canada was *never* a crown corporation. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Canada#Inception.

  • http://twitter.com/andrewfergusson Andrew Fergusson

    Point well made, sorry I didn't look that one up as I assume they had similar roots. Do you know who built the last mile in the eastern provinces, then?

  • Scruffer

    Unless BCE sold off recently they own lots of “pipes”,probably more than the cable co's

  • Scruffer

    Unless BCE sold off recently they own lots of “pipes”,probably more than the cable co's

  • rss iconSubscribe to WirelessNorth.ca
    twitter iconFollow us on Twitter

  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives

    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
  • Blogroll

    • CommunityNorth.ca
    • StartupNorth.ca


© 2007 Wirelessnorth.ca |iKon Wordpress Theme | Powered by Wordpress
RSS